C++ has been a dominant force in software development for decades—but with the rise of safer, more modern languages like Rust and advances in AI-assisted coding, what does the next 5 years look like for C++?
Here are 3 possible scenarios:
Scenario 1: C++ Grows Significantly
Why this could happen:
- C++23 and C++26 bring more modern syntax, modules, contracts, and better tooling.
- Performance-critical industries (gaming, finance, automotive, embedded systems) still need what C++ does best.
- Improved tooling like static analyzers, linters, and IDEs make C++ more beginner-friendly.
- Integration with AI tools (like Copilot or GPT) may reduce the language’s historical complexity.
Result:
More companies double down on C++ for high-performance applications, and universities continue to teach it as a core systems language. Growth especially in embedded systems, game engines, and autonomous vehicles.
Is this senario still possible?
Fifteen years ago—before C++11—many predicted the death of C++. But against all odds, it grew in popularity. Since 2010, Microsoft and others have been actively advocating for a C++ renaissance.
Now C++ is ranked second related to Tiobe Index. No one knows if a similar scenario could happens again.
Scenario 2: C++ Remains Stable and Niche
Why this could happen:
- C++ retains its stronghold in legacy systems and systems-level development.
- Modern languages grow, but C++ remains “too big to ignore”—especially for maintaining massive existing codebases.
- No major breakthroughs in developer ergonomics or beginner-friendliness.
Result:
C++ sees steady usage in specific sectors but doesn’t attract a significant influx of new developers. It’s a core language for experts, not a first choice for newcomers.
Scenario 3: C++ Declines vs. Rust and Safe Languages
Why this could happen:
- Rust, Zig, and other memory-safe systems languages gain ground due to stronger community momentum and modern design.
- Big players (like Google, Microsoft, AWS) promote Rust adoption for security-critical systems.
- AI-assisted programming levels the playing field—performance alone isn’t enough to justify C++ complexity.
Result:
C++ gradually fades from new projects. It’s still used in legacy or ultra-high-performance systems, but Rust becomes the go-to for greenfield development in system-level programming.
This view is largely championed by advocates of newer, safer languages.
And of course—they want to take C++’s place. But who knows? It might actually become part of C++’s future.
Reflection
Which scenario do you believe in?
Are we entering another C++ renaissance, or witnessing its slow replacement by simpler, safer tools?
